Behind the Scenes with Conquest Racing An interview with Chief Engineer Eric Zeto

15.04.2008: Behind the Scenes with Conquest Racing An interview with Chief Engineer Eric Zeto

Throughout the season Conquest Racing will be giving you a more in depth look at the team and their challenges of making the transition to the unified IndyCar Series.

In this first installment, through a short Q&A, Conquest’s Chief Engineer Eric Zeto offers further perspective on the differences in the teams competitiveness and expectations on ovals versus street courses.

Q: How can you explain the difference in performance on ovals between the established IndyCar Series Teams and the former Champ Car teams coming in?

A: At Homestead , the ex-Champ Car teams were facing multiple hurdles. In our case, we had drivers that were seeing an oval track for literally the first time. As any of the current IndyCar drivers will tell you, learning to adapt to the constantly changing conditions, running in traffic with cars literally inches away at over 200 mph, and getting accustomed to having a car on the ‘knife edge’ in terms of balance is a very tall order.

To compound the issue, the teams were just not fully prepared. Just looking around the paddock during the race weekend, long after the IndyCar regulars had left the track for dinner, the Champ Car teams were grinding on bodywork, fitting backordered parts that had just arrived, and just generally trying to build a racecar. Rather than running the parts we wanted like specific suspension, bodywork or roll bars. We were running what we had on hand.

The other factor of course was lack of spares. Graham (Rahal’s crash in testing) was a prime example of what could happen with a misfortunate incident. With another race the following weekend, we couldn’t afford with our rookies to be overly aggressive in race trim. We made our car safe (but slower), to ensure that they were brought home with all four wheels intact.

I don’t want this to be misinterpreted, because I’m not implying that after 2 or 3 more events, we’ll be running with the big boys, but I certainly think we can put on a more respectable showing in time.

Q: If there was such a difference on ovals, why were the "transitional" teams so strong on the street course?

A: The biggest misconception I think that the media has about the challenge facing the so-called ‘transition’ teams is that we will have a difficult time ‘learning’ the new Dallara. In actuality, the car is quite similar to what most of us have been running for years whether it be the Lola or the newer Panoz chassis.

The wheelbase is basically the same, the track widths are in the same ballpark, suspension geometry is easily calculated and configurable, the vehicle weight is similar, we’re using dampers that we’re familiar with and the wheels and tires are effectively identical between the two series.

So at a place like St. Pete, for the ex-Champ Car teams, we’re using ‘tools’ that we’re very familiar with. With Champ Car in recent years becoming defacto spec with the Lola and then subsequently full spec with the Panoz, teams were focusing on the subtleties and details of road course racing, things that in a more open environment, we quite frankly didn’t have time for.

For example, we weren’t agonizing over internal damper dynamics or differential lockup and release characteristics back in the 90’s when there was essentially complete freedom to develop the major aero components of the car or design completely new suspension.

So when you have a situation like we were facing at St. Pete where the IRL has limited the scope for development with the road course package, we effectively had a ‘spec’ car to deal with so it really was a fairly familiar exercise. Once we came to grips with how to use the power band of the Honda, the rest of the car was fairly well understood.

When you look at the oval situation on the other hand, like we had at Homestead , we were facing the opposite problem. Whereas the Indycar regulars have had time these past five years or so to really hone in on the details of an oval racecar, we had to ‘broad stroke’ our adjustments just to try and get into the window in the time available. You have to remember, a lot of us have been around long enough to have at least been racing when it was CART and we were running (and winning) on ovals against Penske, Ganassi and Green, so it’s not like oval racing is a complete ‘mystery’ to us.

The difference is that those teams have had the time to focus on the details on an oval that in the past we put way down on the priority list because we were playing with things like completely different sidepods rather than making sure the sidepod ‘gaps’ were perfect.

Note that I keep making reference to ‘time’, because that really is the crux of the issue. The ‘transition’ teams all thought they were going to be racing in Champ Car at the beginning of March. So in a month or in some cases less, these teams effectively had to re-invent themselves – build new cars, purchase all new parts, build pit equipment, revise engineering tools etc.

When you think about it, when in history have we seen a collection of rookies who had never even previously seen an oval let alone race on one, complete about 100-150 laps of testing and then go straight into a full blown race weekend on a superspeedway no less? Ultimately an Indycar is still a racecar with four wheels on it and what the ‘transition’ teams and drivers need is miles and lots of it.

Q: Can we expect the same competitiveness on road courses later this season as there was on the street course in St. Pete?

A: The series has done quite a good job keeping the package fairly spec for road courses. Other than a few small aerodynamic components and freedom in the area of dampers, there isn’t really any major gains that can be made with the package.

This definitely highlights the talents of the drivers, which fortunately for us, we have a couple of very good shoes. In that regard, particularly with our comfort level with the circuits, I expect that the parity should remain over the course of the season.

Of course, other than at Edmonton and Surfers, the ‘transition’ drivers and teams will have the disadvantage of having to learn the tracks, but given the format of practice on Friday and qualifying on Saturday, that shouldn’t be too great of an impact.

Q: Will all the practice time for the Indy 500 help in leveling the playing field?

A: The Indy 500 is a whole different animal – it really is like a separate championship. The track is so unique, that no other circuit on the schedule can prepare you for it or serve as a point of reference. I’ve had the fortune of participating in the past and I’ve seen great success and great failure all compressed into the one month.

With all the practice days and practice laps, one would get the feeling that everyone would converge on a solution and the drivers would all find a comfort zone, but this is rarely the case. The conditions can change so dramatically hour to hour even, that you can spend an awful lot of time just chasing the track.

Rather than level the playing field, I think Indy really highlights weaknesses – separates the men from the boys so to speak. It’s a place that you either grab a hold of or it grabs a hold of you. Fortunately, I think our guys are up to the task and will respect Indy rather than fear it.


-Karina Redmond-


15.04.2008 / MaP

More News

Rocketsports Racing announces Long Beach driver line up
Brazilian Antonio Pizzonia to make his return to Champ Car alongside Finland’s Juho Annala who will be making his debut Rocketsports Racing is proud to announce a two-car effort in the upcoming Toyota Grand Prix of Long Beach. The driver lineup for the team will include former-Rocketsports driver Antonio Pizzonia and the introduction of a new face t more >>
Promising Top Five Finish for Conquest Racing’s Enrique Bernoldi in St. Petersburg
The race may have started under yellow but it quickly got exciting for the Conquest Racing team who led their first laps of the season, ran in the top two with both drivers and came home with a fifth place finish with driver Enrique Bernoldi (#36 Sangari Dallara/Honda/Firestone) in their first street course race in the IndyCar Series at the Honda Grand Prix of St. Petersburg. more >>
Conquest Racing’s Franck Perera to Start Tenth in St. Petersburg
-Enrique Bernoldi 18th on the grid - The new qualifying system put in place for the IndyCar Series made for an exciting qualifying session for Conquest Racing with rookie driver Franck Perera fighting for a spot in the Firestone Fast Six. In the end, the Frenchman didn’t make it to the final round but "Fearless" Franck did score a top-ten start in his first street more >>
Top Five Start for Conquest Racing in St. Petersburg
Conquest Racing took part in two practice sessions today at the Honda Grand Prix of St. Petersburg and ended the second session in the top-five in their first outing with their IndyCar Series Dallara on a street course. Franck Perera was the highest ranked Conquest driver at the end of the day with a lap of 63.6346 seconds placing him fifth in the second session and sixt more >>
Conquest Racing Honda Grand Prix of St. Petersburg Preview
Conquest Racing at a glance IndyCar Series starts: 18 Best Start: 4th Best Finish: 2nd St. Petersburg Stats Starts: 1 (Champ Car World Series) Best Finish: 4th Best Start: 6th St. Petersburg Conquest Racing Pre-race Notes Conquest Racing will be making their second star more >>
David Martinez Joins Forsythe-Pettit Racing for Long Beach
David Martinez announced today that he has been selected by Forsythe-Pettit Racing to compete in this year’s Toyota Grand Prix of Long Beach, which will take place April 18 – 20 in the streets of Long Beach, California. The 34th edition of this historic race will serve as a celebration of Champ Car’s history as it transitions into one unified open wheel series in North A more >>
Conquest Racing’s Franck Perera Top Rookie in IndyCar Series Opener at Homestead
It was quite a learning experience for the Conquest Racing pair of Enrique Bernoldi (#36 Opes Prime/Sangari Dallara/Honda/Firestone) and Franck Perera (#34 ARES/Opes Prime Dallara/Honda/Firestone) in their first oval race. Perera continued to demonstrate his talent ending up top rookie in 14th position and second of the transition teams behind Oriol Servia, who counts over 20 ova more >>
Conquest Racing First of the Transition Teams in Homestead Qualifying
Conquest Racing took part in their first oval qualifying session of the season tonight in at Homestead-Miami Speedway with drivers Franck Perera (#34 ARES/ Opes Prime Dallara/Honda/Firestone) and Enrique Bernoldi (#36 Opes Prime/Sangari Dallara/Honda/Firestone) who were qualifying for the first time ever on an oval. Perera qualified 15th overall and first of the transition teams more >>
Conquest Racing Wraps Up Testing in Sebring with Strong Performance
Conquest Racing completed a satisfying first IndyCar® Series test today at Sebring International Raceway. The team’s second and final day of testing on the 1.66 mile road course was a more productive one than yesterday with both drivers posting competitive lap times. Unluckily for the team, track time was once again cut short, this time on account of morning showers. more >>
Conquest Racing On-track in Sebring
Since Conquest Racing took possession of their Dallara chassis, it’s been a grueling last few weeks for the team. Long days, short nights and even all-nighters were part of the regimen in order to make it to the first open-test in Sebring. And today, the mission was accomplished when Conquest Racing completed their first IndyCar Series laps of 2008 at Sebring International Racewa more >>
Conquest Racing Signs Brazilian Enrique Bernoldi
.. to 2008 IndyCar Series Ride Conquest Racing is set for the 2008 IndyCar® Series season with today’s announcement that the team has signed former Formula 1 driver, Brazilian Enrique Bernoldi, as a teammate to Frenchman Franck Perera who was confirmed last month. Bernoldi will be making his debut in the IndyCar Series thi more >>
Forsythe Performance Research offers Winning Services to Motorsports Industry
Forsythe Racing Inc., a long-time leader in the motorsports industry, has formed Forsythe Performance Research (FPR) to provide its high-tech services to the motorsports industry. The announcement, made today by FPR Vice President Neil Micklewright, signals a new direction for the Forsythe team that boasts an incredible record of success in motorsports, dating back to it more >>

by Charlie Roeber more >>
2001-2023 copyright